vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.7× Take-Two Interactive). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 44.2% vs -5.5%, a 49.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs 18.3%). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($864.0M vs $236.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs 10.2%).
Total revenue of oil and gas companies is listed in billions of U.S. dollars. Total revenue is usually self-reported by companies, and often reported by neutral, unbiased, reliable publications. Reported data may be subsequently revised or restated due to a wide range of issues such as exchange rates, contract settlements, or mid-year discontinuation of products or services. Fiscal years are for January 1 to December 31, except where noted. Empty cells indicate that no data for that year has ...
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
CQP vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $1.3B | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 44.2% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.3% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.6% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.0M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $641.0M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $623.0M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $635.0M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.0M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $682.0M | $-2.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.5% |
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | -193.9% |
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.7% | -207.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-17.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.0M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $17.4B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $182.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.0M | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.0M | $776.0M |
| Q4 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $17.4B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5B | $12.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5B | $12.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $887.0M | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $864.0M | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.7% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.6B | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $887.0M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.0M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.0M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $691.0M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.0M | $-191.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $669.0M | $-8.9M |
| Q4 25 | $864.0M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $610.0M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $490.0M | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.0M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $827.0M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $652.0M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $702.0M | $-226.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $633.0M | $-55.1M |
| Q4 25 | 29.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.7% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.6% | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.98× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CQP
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $2.9B | 98% |
| Regasification Service | $34.0M | 1% |
| Other | $17.0M | 1% |
TTWO
Segment breakdown not available.
