vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and ENTEGRIS INC (ENTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENTEGRIS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($823.9M vs $268.0M, roughly 3.1× Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd). Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs 6.0%, a 24.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (272.1% vs -3.1%). ENTEGRIS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($134.0M vs $38.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd's revenue compounded faster (124.8% CAGR vs 3.4%).
Seiko Group is a corporate group composed of Seiko Group Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates. It used to be recognized as a corporate group consisting of three core companies Seiko Holdings Corp., Seiko Instruments Inc., and Seiko Epson Corp. The three companies were linked by a common thread of timepiece technology. Although Epson still develops and manufactures wristwatches for the Seiko Group, Epson and its subsidiaries are not considered part of the group.
Entegris, Inc. is a supplier of materials for the semiconductor and other high-tech industries. Entegris has approximately 8,000 employees throughout its global operations. It has manufacturing, customer service and/or research facilities in the United States, Canada, China, Germany, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. The company’s corporate headquarters are in Billerica, Massachusetts.
CRDO vs ENTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $268.0M | $823.9M |
| Net Profit | $82.6M | $49.4M |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | 29.4% | 12.7% |
| Net Margin | 30.8% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 272.1% | -3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2055.9% | -51.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $268.0M | $823.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.1M | $807.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.0M | $792.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.0M | $773.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.0M | $849.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $807.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.8M | $812.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.1M | $771.0M |
| Q4 25 | $82.6M | $49.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.4M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $62.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $102.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.5M | $77.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.5M | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.0K | $45.3M |
| Q4 25 | 67.5% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.4% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.2% | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.6% | 46.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.2% | 45.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.4% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.8% | 46.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 61.4% | 45.6% |
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.7% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.2% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.1% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 30.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $813.6M | $360.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $4.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $8.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.94× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $813.6M | $360.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $479.6M | $399.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $431.3M | $376.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.2M | $340.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.0M | $329.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.6M | $432.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $410.0M | $320.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.1M | $340.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $781.4M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $681.6M | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $618.2M | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.9M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.1M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $540.2M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.0M | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $905.2M | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $809.3M | $8.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $719.9M | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $638.6M | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $644.9M | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.9M | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $592.5M | $8.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $61.7M | $192.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $38.5M | $134.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.4% | 16.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.7% | 7.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.75× | 3.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $143.6M | $396.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $61.7M | $192.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.2M | $249.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | $113.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $140.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $176.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.2M | $197.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $111.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $147.2M |
| Q4 25 | $38.5M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.3M | $182.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.2M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-383.0K | $32.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.7M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.1M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $962.0K | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.1M | $80.6M |
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | 3.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | 3.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | 2.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.14× | 2.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.42× | 3.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRDO
| Other | $132.1M | 49% |
| HK | $104.4M | 39% |
| RESTOFTHEWORLD | $31.5M | 12% |
ENTG
| Fabs | $516.3M | 63% |
| Equipment And Engineering | $121.8M | 15% |
| Chemical And Materials | $83.8M | 10% |
| Other | $61.7M | 7% |
| Non Semi | $40.3M | 5% |
