vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) and Check-Cap Ltd (MBAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Smart Powerr Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($88.8K vs $47.9K, roughly 1.9× Check-Cap Ltd). Check-Cap Ltd runs the higher net margin — 2.3% vs -529.4%, a 531.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Smart Powerr Corp. (formerly China Recycling Energy Corp) is a specialized smart energy and energy efficiency solutions provider. Its core offerings include waste energy recovery systems, energy efficiency optimization services, and intelligent energy management platform deployment, primarily serving industrial, commercial and public sector clients in the Chinese market.
Check-Cap Ltd is a clinical-stage medical technology company specializing in non-invasive colorectal cancer screening solutions. Its core offering is an ingestible imaging capsule that requires no prior bowel preparation, targeting global healthcare markets to boost accessibility of early colon cancer detection for at-risk patient groups.
CREG vs MBAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $88.8K | $47.9K |
| Net Profit | $-470.4K | $1.1K |
| Gross Margin | 41.6% | 5.2% |
| Operating Margin | -691.5% | 2.9% |
| Net Margin | -529.4% | 2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.5% | 100.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $88.8K | $47.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-470.4K | $1.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-300.4K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-884.5K | — |
| Q4 25 | 41.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -691.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -235.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1648.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5635.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -529.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -330.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2000.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4288.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $94.3K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $143.1M | $1.4K |
| Total Assets | $157.6M | $184.9K |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $94.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $143.1M | $1.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $157.6M | $184.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $132.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.5M | $-89.2K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -81.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $-89.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-53.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-131.3K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -81.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
