vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP (CRS) and SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($728.0M vs $480.2M, roughly 1.5× SunCoke Energy, Inc.). CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP runs the higher net margin — 14.5% vs -17.8%, a 32.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.5% vs -1.2%). CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($85.9M vs $32.8M). Over the past eight quarters, CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -0.8%).
Carpenter Technology Corporation develops, manufactures, and distributes stainless steels and corrosion-resistant nickel, copper and titanium alloys as well as powdered alloys for 3D additive manufacturing. In fiscal year 2018, the company's revenues were derived from the aerospace and defense industry (55%), the industrial and consumer industry (17%), the medical industry (8%), the transportation industry (7%), the energy industry (7%), and the distribution industry (6%). The company's produ...
Energy Brands, also doing business as Glacéau, is a privately owned subsidiary of the Coca-Cola Company based in Whitestone, Queens, New York, that manufactures and distributes various lines of drinks marketed as enhanced water. Founded in May 1996 by J. Darius Bikoff with an electrolyte enhanced line of water called Smartwater, Energy Brands initially distributed its products to health food stores and independent retailers in the New York area. Adding Fruitwater and Vitaminwater to its line ...
CRS vs SXC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $728.0M | $480.2M |
| Net Profit | $105.3M | $-85.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 21.3% | -20.4% |
| Net Margin | 14.5% | -17.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.5% | -1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.2% | -461.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.09 | $-1.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $728.0M | $480.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $733.7M | $487.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $755.6M | $434.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $727.0M | $436.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $676.9M | $486.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $717.6M | $490.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $798.7M | $470.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $684.9M | $488.4M |
| Q4 25 | $105.3M | $-85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.5M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.4M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.1M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.8M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.6M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.3% | -20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 7.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | -17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $2.09 | $-1.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.43 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.21 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.88 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.66 | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.67 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.85 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.12 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $231.9M | $88.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $685.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $597.3M |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $231.9M | $88.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.0M | $80.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $186.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.5M | $193.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.1M | $189.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.2M | $164.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.1M | $81.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.5M | $120.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $685.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $691.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $493.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $492.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $491.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $491.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $490.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $597.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $695.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $677.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $684.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $680.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $658.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $636.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $623.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.79× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $132.2M | $56.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $85.9M | $32.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.8% | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.4% | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.26× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $316.7M | $42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $132.2M | $56.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $258.1M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.9M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.2M | $107.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.5M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.5M | $10.0M |
| Q4 25 | $85.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.4M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.2M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0M | $20.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.6M | $36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.8M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.9M | $-5.5M |
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | -1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.32× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.31× | 9.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 1.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | 2.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 3.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.81× | -0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.25× | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRS
| Aerospace And Defense Markets | $448.8M | 62% |
| Industrial And Consumer Markets | $88.4M | 12% |
| Performance Engineered Products Segment | $83.2M | 11% |
| Medical Market | $54.7M | 8% |
| Energy Market | $48.5M | 7% |
| Transportation Market | $21.2M | 3% |
| Distribution Market | $17.2M | 2% |
SXC
Segment breakdown not available.