vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) and TITAN INTERNATIONAL INC (TWI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SunCoke Energy, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($480.2M vs $410.4M, roughly 1.2× TITAN INTERNATIONAL INC). TITAN INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — -13.7% vs -17.8%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TITAN INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -1.2%). SunCoke Energy, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($32.8M vs $-5.1M). Over the past eight quarters, SunCoke Energy, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.8% CAGR vs -7.7%).
Energy Brands, also doing business as Glacéau, is a privately owned subsidiary of the Coca-Cola Company based in Whitestone, Queens, New York, that manufactures and distributes various lines of drinks marketed as enhanced water. Founded in May 1996 by J. Darius Bikoff with an electrolyte enhanced line of water called Smartwater, Energy Brands initially distributed its products to health food stores and independent retailers in the New York area. Adding Fruitwater and Vitaminwater to its line ...
The Titan Tire Corporation is an American tire corporation formed in 1993 by Maurice M. Taylor Jr., then owner of Titan Wheel, purchased the Dyneer Corporation, manufacturer various off-road tires. Titan is one of the largest manufacturer of off-road tires in North America. It continued expanding its product offering and reach by purchasing the off-road tire assets of Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation in 1994. In 1997, Titan International split Titan Tire Corporation into subsidiary of(NYSE:...
SXC vs TWI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $480.2M | $410.4M |
| Net Profit | $-85.6M | $-56.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.9% |
| Operating Margin | -20.4% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | -17.8% | -13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.2% | 7.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -461.2% | -4285.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.00 | $-0.88 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $480.2M | $410.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $487.0M | $466.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $434.1M | $460.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $436.0M | $490.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $486.0M | $383.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $490.1M | $448.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $470.9M | $532.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $488.4M | $482.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-85.6M | $-56.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $-649.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.7M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $9.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.0% |
| Q4 25 | -20.4% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.1% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | -17.8% | -13.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.00 | $-0.88 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $-0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.23 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $88.7M | $202.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $685.5M | $564.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $597.3M | $514.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.15× | 1.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.7M | $202.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.4M | $205.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.2M | $184.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.7M | $174.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $189.6M | $196.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.7M | $227.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.9M | $224.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $120.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $685.5M | $564.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $691.1M | $556.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $493.4M | $565.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $492.9M | $571.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.3M | $553.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $491.8M | $503.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.3M | $535.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $490.8M | $554.4M |
| Q4 25 | $597.3M | $514.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $695.9M | $569.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $677.7M | $570.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $684.6M | $534.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.2M | $496.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $658.6M | $597.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $636.9M | $609.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $623.0M | $630.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | 0.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.72× | 1.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.72× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.75× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.77× | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.79× | 0.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $56.6M | $12.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $32.8M | $-5.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | -1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 4.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $42.3M | $-24.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $56.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5M | $14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $-38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.9M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $107.2M | $59.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.3M | $70.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $32.8M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.3M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $-53.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $41.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.8M | $53.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.5M | $-14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.1% | -3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.57× | 6.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.43× | 32.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.50× | 0.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SXC
Segment breakdown not available.
TWI
| Wheels And Tires Including Assemblies | $151.3M | 37% |
| Earthmovingconstruction | $140.7M | 34% |
| Consumer | $108.5M | 26% |
| Undercarriage Systems And Components | $9.9M | 2% |
