vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) and HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($53.6M vs $35.7M, roughly 1.5× CRISPR Therapeutics AG). On growth, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.7% vs -82.3%). HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($45.3M vs $-50.3M).
CRISPR Therapeutics AG is a Swiss–American biotechnology company headquartered in Zug, Switzerland. The company does business as CRISPR Therapeutics, Inc. in the United States. It was one of the first companies formed to utilize the CRISPR gene editing platform to develop medicines for the treatment of various rare and common diseases. The company has approximately 500 employees and has offices in Zug, Switzerland, Boston, Massachusetts, San Francisco, California and London, United Kingdom. I...
HomeTrust Bancshares Inc. is an Asheville, North Carolina–based bank holding company with $4.3 billion in assets and 33 branches in North and South Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee. It is the parent of seven community banks—HomeTrust Bank, Tryon Federal Bank, Shelby Savings Bank, Home Savings Bank, Industrial Federal Bank, Cherryville Federal Bank and Rutherford County Bank.
CRSP vs HTB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $35.7M | $53.6M |
| Net Profit | $-37.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -181.0% | 37.0% |
| Net Margin | -104.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -82.3% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -141.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.41 | $0.93 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.7M | $51.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-37.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -181.0% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -104.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.41 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.88 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $324.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $600.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $324.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $315.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $297.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $299.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $279.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $293.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $294.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $380.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $600.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $595.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $579.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $565.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $551.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $540.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $523.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $513.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-50.0M | $49.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-50.3M | $45.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -140.9% | 84.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 7.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-325.9M | $93.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.0M | $45.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $70.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.3M | $42.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 84.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 138.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -140.9% | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 85.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRSP
| Collaboration Revenue | $35.0M | 98% |
| Grant | $2.3M | 6% |
HTB
Segment breakdown not available.
