vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CARLISLE COMPANIES INC (CSL) and Generac (GNRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Generac is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× CARLISLE COMPANIES INC). CARLISLE COMPANIES INC runs the higher net margin — 12.1% vs 6.9%, a 5.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Generac posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.4% vs -4.0%). Generac produced more free cash flow last quarter ($89.9M vs $-73.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Generac's revenue compounded faster (3.0% CAGR vs -14.8%).
Carlisle Companies Incorporated is a supplier of construction products that make buildings more energy efficient and resilient. The company manufactures and sells single-ply roofing products as well as warranted systems and accessories for the commercial building industry. The company is organized into two segments, including Carlisle Construction Materials and Carlisle Weatherproofing Technologies. The company's product portfolio includes moisture protection products, protective roofing unde...
Generac Holdings Inc., commonly referred to as Generac, is a Fortune 1000 American manufacturer of backup power generation products for residential, light commercial, and industrial markets. Generac's power systems range in output from 800 watts to 9 megawatts and are available through independent dealers, retailers, and wholesalers. Generac has headquarters in Waukesha, Wisconsin, and manufacturing facilities in Berlin, Oshkosh, Jefferson, Eagle, and Whitewater, all in Wisconsin.
CSL vs GNRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $127.7M | $73.1M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | 12.1% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.0% | 12.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -10.9% | 65.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.10 | $1.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $942.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $998.2M |
| Q1 26 | $127.7M | $73.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $-24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.2M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.8M | $74.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.3M | $43.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.8M | $117.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $244.3M | $113.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $712.4M | $59.1M |
| Q1 26 | 34.5% | 38.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.8% | 36.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.0% | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.3% | 39.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.2% | 39.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.1% | 40.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.2% | 37.6% |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.8% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | 10.3% |
| Q1 26 | 12.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | $3.10 | $1.24 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.06 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.98 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.88 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.20 | $0.73 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.76 | $2.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.25 | $1.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.84 | $0.97 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $771.3M | $265.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $44.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | — | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $771.3M | $265.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $341.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $300.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.4M | $223.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $220.2M | $187.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $753.5M | $281.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $214.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $218.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $5.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.61× | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.45× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.89× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.87× | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.77× | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.83× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $119.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-73.0M | $89.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | 8.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $924.8M | $330.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $119.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $386.0M | $189.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $426.9M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $287.1M | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $58.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $370.6M | $339.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $312.8M | $212.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $183.4M | $77.7M |
| Q1 26 | $-73.0M | $89.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.1M | $129.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $393.4M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $258.3M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.0M | $286.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.5M | $183.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.5M | $49.7M |
| Q1 26 | -6.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.9% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.12× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.28× | 2.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.28× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.26× | 1.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSL
| CCM | $758.0M | 72% |
| CWT | $294.0M | 28% |
GNRC
| Residential | $549.3M | 52% |
| Commercial & Industrial | $510.0M | 48% |
