vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and CVR ENERGY INC (CVI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CONSTELLIUM SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.1× CVR ENERGY INC). CONSTELLIUM SE runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs -8.1%, a 13.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. CONSTELLIUM SE produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.0M vs $21.0M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
CVR Energy Inc is a United States-based energy holding company operating two core segments: petroleum refining and nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing. It produces a wide range of products including gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and agricultural fertilizers, primarily serving commercial, industrial and agricultural customers across North America.
CSTM vs CVI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $-160.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | -5.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | -8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 20.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -56.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $-1.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $-160.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | $-110.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $-114.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-123.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-124.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $21.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | -5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | -8.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | -6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $-1.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $3.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $-1.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $-1.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $512.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $3.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $512.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $511.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $670.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $596.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $695.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $987.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $534.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $586.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $730.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $840.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $466.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $580.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $703.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $675.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $849.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | 3.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | 3.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $21.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 1.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $163.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $176.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $-195.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $81.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $-246.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $38.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | -14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 3.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
CVI
Segment breakdown not available.
