vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Fidelity National Information Services (FIS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Fidelity National Information Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.3× CONSTELLIUM SE). Fidelity National Information Services runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs 5.1%, a 13.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Fidelity National Information Services produced more free cash flow last quarter ($739.0M vs $109.0M).

Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is an American multinational corporation which offers a wide range of financial products and services. FIS is most known for its development of Financial Technology, or FinTech. Annually, FIS facilitates the movement of roughly US$9 trillion through the processing of approximately 75 billion transactions in service to more than 20,000 clients around the globe.

CSTM vs FIS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FIS
FIS
1.3× larger
FIS
$2.8B
$2.2B
CSTM
Higher net margin
FIS
FIS
13.1% more per $
FIS
18.2%
5.1%
CSTM
More free cash flow
FIS
FIS
$630.0M more FCF
FIS
$739.0M
$109.0M
CSTM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Revenue
$2.2B
$2.8B
Net Profit
$112.0M
$511.0M
Gross Margin
38.3%
Operating Margin
7.5%
18.8%
Net Margin
5.1%
18.2%
Revenue YoY
8.1%
Net Profit YoY
97.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.79
$0.98

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
$2.2B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$2.2B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$2.1B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$2.0B
$2.5B
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.6B
Q2 24
$1.9B
$2.5B
Q1 24
$2.5B
Net Profit
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
$112.0M
$511.0M
Q3 25
$88.0M
$264.0M
Q2 25
$36.0M
$-470.0M
Q1 25
$37.0M
$77.0M
Q4 24
$259.0M
Q3 24
$224.0M
Q2 24
$76.0M
$243.0M
Q1 24
$724.0M
Gross Margin
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
38.3%
Q3 25
37.8%
Q2 25
36.4%
Q1 25
34.7%
Q4 24
36.9%
Q3 24
38.0%
Q2 24
38.2%
Q1 24
37.1%
Operating Margin
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
7.5%
18.8%
Q3 25
5.8%
16.8%
Q2 25
2.7%
15.6%
Q1 25
3.1%
13.7%
Q4 24
18.5%
Q3 24
19.1%
Q2 24
5.4%
15.2%
Q1 24
14.6%
Net Margin
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
5.1%
18.2%
Q3 25
4.1%
9.7%
Q2 25
1.7%
-18.0%
Q1 25
1.9%
3.0%
Q4 24
10.0%
Q3 24
8.7%
Q2 24
3.9%
9.8%
Q1 24
29.3%
EPS (diluted)
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
$0.79
$0.98
Q3 25
$0.62
$0.50
Q2 25
$0.25
$-0.90
Q1 25
$0.26
$0.15
Q4 24
$0.51
Q3 24
$0.41
Q2 24
$0.51
$0.44
Q1 24
$1.25

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$120.0M
$599.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.9B
$9.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$952.0M
$13.9B
Total Assets
$5.4B
$33.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.00×
0.65×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
$120.0M
$599.0M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$571.0M
Q2 25
$133.0M
$581.0M
Q1 25
$118.0M
$805.0M
Q4 24
$834.0M
Q3 24
$1.3B
Q2 24
$2.1B
Q1 24
$3.3B
Total Debt
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
$1.9B
$9.1B
Q3 25
$2.0B
$8.9B
Q2 25
$2.0B
$8.9B
Q1 25
$1.9B
$8.7B
Q4 24
$9.7B
Q3 24
$10.5B
Q2 24
$10.6B
Q1 24
$10.6B
Stockholders' Equity
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
$952.0M
$13.9B
Q3 25
$845.0M
$13.9B
Q2 25
$780.0M
$14.2B
Q1 25
$745.0M
$15.1B
Q4 24
$15.7B
Q3 24
$16.6B
Q2 24
$796.0M
$17.0B
Q1 24
$18.0B
Total Assets
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
$5.4B
$33.5B
Q3 25
$5.4B
$33.0B
Q2 25
$5.4B
$33.4B
Q1 25
$5.2B
$32.8B
Q4 24
$33.8B
Q3 24
$34.3B
Q2 24
$34.6B
Q1 24
$35.9B
Debt / Equity
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
2.00×
0.65×
Q3 25
2.34×
0.64×
Q2 25
2.53×
0.63×
Q1 25
2.56×
0.57×
Q4 24
0.62×
Q3 24
0.63×
Q2 24
0.62×
Q1 24
0.59×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$218.0M
$758.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$109.0M
$739.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
5.0%
26.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.0%
0.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.95×
1.48×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$159.0M
$2.5B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
$218.0M
$758.0M
Q3 25
$99.0M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$114.0M
$382.0M
Q1 25
$58.0M
$457.0M
Q4 24
$782.0M
Q3 24
$641.0M
Q2 24
$138.0M
$546.0M
Q1 24
$206.0M
Free Cash Flow
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
$109.0M
$739.0M
Q3 25
$24.0M
$952.0M
Q2 25
$37.0M
$343.0M
Q1 25
$-11.0M
$420.0M
Q4 24
$764.0M
Q3 24
$605.0M
Q2 24
$54.0M
$530.0M
Q1 24
$179.0M
FCF Margin
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
5.0%
26.3%
Q3 25
1.1%
35.0%
Q2 25
1.8%
13.1%
Q1 25
-0.6%
16.6%
Q4 24
29.4%
Q3 24
23.5%
Q2 24
2.8%
21.3%
Q1 24
7.3%
Capex Intensity
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
5.0%
0.7%
Q3 25
3.5%
2.2%
Q2 25
3.7%
1.5%
Q1 25
3.5%
1.5%
Q4 24
0.7%
Q3 24
1.4%
Q2 24
4.3%
0.6%
Q1 24
1.1%
Cash Conversion
CSTM
CSTM
FIS
FIS
Q4 25
1.95×
1.48×
Q3 25
1.13×
3.83×
Q2 25
3.17×
Q1 25
1.57×
5.94×
Q4 24
3.02×
Q3 24
2.86×
Q2 24
1.82×
2.25×
Q1 24
0.28×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CSTM
CSTM

Packaging Rolled Products$1.0B46%
Automotive Rolled Products$318.0M14%
Aerospace Rolled Products$270.0M12%
Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products$232.0M11%
Automotive Extruded Products$220.0M10%
Other Extruded Products$132.0M6%
Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products$22.0M1%

FIS
FIS

Banking Solutions$1.6B57%
Other$701.0M25%
Capital Market Solutions$508.0M18%

Related Comparisons