vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CONSTELLIUM SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.5× Hubbell Incorporated). Hubbell Incorporated runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs 5.1%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Hubbell Incorporated produced more free cash flow last quarter ($388.8M vs $109.0M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
CSTM vs HUBB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $217.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 20.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 10.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $4.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | $217.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $255.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $244.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $169.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $219.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $213.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $147.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 20.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $4.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $4.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $4.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $3.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $3.94 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $497.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $497.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $680.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $399.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $360.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $345.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $445.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $406.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $400.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.9B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.65× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $447.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $388.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 26.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 2.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $874.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $447.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $284.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $260.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $37.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $432.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $239.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $92.2M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | $388.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $220.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $364.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $188.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $205.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |
