vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.8× CONSTELLIUM SE). CONSTELLIUM SE runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs 1.5%, a 3.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($208.0M vs $109.0M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational information technology infrastructure services provider, headquartered in New York City and created from the spin-off of IBM's infrastructure services business in 2021. The company designs, builds, manages and develops large-scale information systems. The company also has business advisory services. It is currently the world's largest IT infrastructure services provider, and the fifth-largest consulting provider.
CSTM vs KD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $3.9B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $57.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 2.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -73.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | $57.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $56.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $69.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $215.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-45.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $2.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $11.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | 1.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1B |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $996.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $11.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | 1.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | 2.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | 2.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $428.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $208.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 5.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 7.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $299.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $428.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $146.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $-124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $581.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $260.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $149.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $145.0M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $-267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $341.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $151.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $-170.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-57.0M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | 7.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | -2.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 8.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | -4.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
KD
| Principal Markets Segment | $1.4B | 37% |
| United States Segment | $958.0M | 25% |
| Strategic Markets Segment | $905.0M | 23% |
| Other | $568.0M | 15% |
