vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CONSTELLIUM SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.8× Snap-on). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 5.1%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $109.0M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
CSTM vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
