vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.7× CONSTELLIUM SE). CONSTELLIUM SE runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs 1.4%, a 3.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Stanley Black & Decker produced more free cash flow last quarter ($155.3M vs $109.0M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
CSTM vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $19.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $318.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $476.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.1B |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.9B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.9B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-431.0M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $485.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-496.7M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -22.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
