vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.1× CONSTELLIUM SE). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 5.1%, a 17.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $109.0M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
CSTM vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |