vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and Xerox Holdings Corp (XRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CONSTELLIUM SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.1× Xerox Holdings Corp). Xerox Holdings Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($192.0M vs $109.0M).
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Xerox Corporation is an American corporation that sells printers, digital document products and services in more than 160 countries. Xerox was the pioneer of the photocopier market, beginning with the introduction of the Xerox 914 in 1959, so much so that the word xerox is commonly used as a synonym for photocopy. Xerox is headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut, though it is incorporated in New York with its largest group of employees based around Rochester, New York, where the company was fou...
CSTM vs XRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 25.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $-0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $-760.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $-106.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $-90.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-113.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | -38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -78.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $-6.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $512.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $4.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | $444.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | 9.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $512.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $479.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $449.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $336.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $576.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $521.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $485.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $685.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $444.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $365.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | 9.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 11.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | 3.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | 2.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $208.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | $192.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 9.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $187.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $-89.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $351.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $123.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-79.0M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | $192.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $104.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $-94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $346.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $117.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-87.0M |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | -6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 6.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
XRX
| Other | $596.0M | 29% |
| Manufactured Product Other | $485.0M | 24% |
| Supplies Paper And Other Sales | $483.0M | 24% |
| IT Solutions Segment | $155.0M | 8% |
| CA | $128.0M | 6% |
| IT Products | $100.0M | 5% |
| Rental And Other | $52.0M | 3% |
| Financial Service | $29.0M | 1% |
