vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. (CSW) and FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FULTON FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.2M vs $233.0M, roughly 1.4× CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC.). FULTON FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.2% vs 4.4%, a 23.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs 4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (5.1% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
CSW vs FULT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $233.0M | $336.2M |
| Net Profit | $10.3M | $94.8M |
| Gross Margin | 39.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | 28.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.3% | 4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -61.9% | 1.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $336.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.0M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | $334.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $263.6M | $324.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $230.5M | $318.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.6M | $319.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.9M | $317.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226.2M | $334.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $94.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.3M | $99.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.7M | $100.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $99.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.1M | $93.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.9M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | $63.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $95.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 38.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.8% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.3% | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.3% | 30.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.41 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.43 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.05 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.60 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.26 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.47 | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $32.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $225.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $273.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $800.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.2M | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $32.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $32.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $32.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $32.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $32.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $32.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $32.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $31.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.81× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $162.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.9M | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.8M | $116.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.6M | $91.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $703.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $416.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.8M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.7M | $157.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 3.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.52× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.48× | 0.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.43× | 6.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | -0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 1.66× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSW
| Contractor Solutions Segment | $166.3M | 71% |
| Specialized Reliability Solutions Segment | $38.2M | 16% |
| Engineered Building Solutions Segment | $28.5M | 12% |
FULT
Segment breakdown not available.
