vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. (CSW) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $233.0M, roughly 1.5× CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC.). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 4.4%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs 4.3%). INTERFACE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.6M vs $22.7M). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 5.1%).
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
CSW vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $233.0M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $10.3M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 39.7% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.3% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -61.9% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $233.0M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $263.6M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $230.5M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.6M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.9M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226.2M | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.9M | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | $10.3M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.7M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.1M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.9M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.8M | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | 39.7% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.0% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.2% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.6% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.5% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.4% | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.3% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.0% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.1% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.41 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.43 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.05 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.60 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.26 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.47 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.03 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.2M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $40.2M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.5M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $225.8M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.8M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $273.2M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $800.1M | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.0M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.2M | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $615.7M | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.75× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.7M | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.8% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.81× | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $162.0M | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.9M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.8M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.6M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.8M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.7M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.4M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.52× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.48× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.43× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSW
| Contractor Solutions Segment | $166.3M | 71% |
| Specialized Reliability Solutions Segment | $38.2M | 16% |
| Engineered Building Solutions Segment | $28.5M | 12% |
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
