vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and EPAM Systems (EPAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.4B, roughly 2.0× EPAM Systems). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 7.8%, a 9.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EPAM Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs 9.3%). Cintas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($425.0M vs $268.1M). Over the past eight quarters, EPAM Systems's revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs 7.9%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
CTAS vs EPAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $495.3M | $109.4M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 10.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 12.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 5.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $1.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $106.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $73.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $103.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $98.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $397.6M | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 29.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 30.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | 34.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.4% |
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.6% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.5% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $1.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $1.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $1.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $1.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $2.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $1.70 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.84 | $1.97 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.8M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.5M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.58× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $531.2M | $282.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $425.0M | $268.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.2% | 19.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 2.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | $612.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $282.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $294.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $53.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $24.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $242.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.1M | $129.9M |
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $286.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $43.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $14.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $114.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $237.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $550.1M | $123.2M |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 2.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 2.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 0.58× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.65× | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
EPAM
Segment breakdown not available.
