vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and Evercore Inc. (EVR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.4B, roughly 2.0× Evercore Inc.). Evercore Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.0% vs 17.7%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evercore Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.3% vs 9.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Evercore Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.2% CAGR vs 7.9%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Evercore Inc., formerly known as Evercore Partners, is a global independent investment banking advisory firm founded in 1995 by Roger Altman, David Offensend, and Austin Beutner. The firm has advised on over $4.7 trillion of merger, acquisition, and restructuring transactions since its founding.
CTAS vs EVR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $495.3M | $322.7M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 23.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 100.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 106.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $7.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $838.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $699.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $979.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $738.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $693.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $322.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $204.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $144.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $97.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $140.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $73.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 10.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.20 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $4.80 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $3.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $2.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $3.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $3.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $1.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $1.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $531.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $425.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $807.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $560.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $437.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $-549.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $686.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $234.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $348.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $798.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $541.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $411.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $-569.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $673.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $226.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $340.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 61.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 51.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | -81.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 68.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 49.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 3.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 4.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | -3.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 4.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 2.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 4.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
EVR
| Advisory Fees (1) | $1.2B | 89% |
| Commissions and Related Revenue | $62.7M | 4% |
| Underwriting Fees | $55.1M | 4% |
| Asset Management and Administration Fees (2) | $23.7M | 2% |
| Other Revenue, net | $15.4M | 1% |
