vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and GE HealthCare (GEHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GE HealthCare is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.1B vs $2.8B, roughly 1.8× Cintas). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 8.0%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cintas posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs 7.4%). Cintas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($425.0M vs $112.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs 3.0%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc., stylized GE HealthCare, is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. It operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical Diagnostics, which manufactures...
CTAS vs GEHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $5.1B |
| Net Profit | $495.3M | $411.0M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 38.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 8.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 7.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | -31.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $4.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $411.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $588.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $446.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $486.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $564.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $721.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $428.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 38.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 39.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 42.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 42.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 12.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $1.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $1.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $1.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $1.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $1.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $0.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $10.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $10.7B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $37.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 0.95× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $9.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $7.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $37.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $36.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $36.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $35.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $33.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $33.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $33.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $31.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | 0.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 1.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $531.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $425.0M | $112.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.2% | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $94.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $250.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $-119.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $112.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $98.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $-183.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | -3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | -0.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
GEHC
| Imaging revenues | $2.3B | 45% |
| AVS revenues | $1.3B | 26% |
| PDx revenues | $770.0M | 15% |
| PCS revenues | $704.0M | 14% |
| Other revenues | $18.0M | 0% |