vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and IMPERIAL OIL LTD (IMO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMPERIAL OIL LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.2B vs $6.4B, roughly 1.3× Cintas). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs 4.4%, a 3.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cintas posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs -10.5%). Cintas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.3B vs $938.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (61.2% CAGR vs -4.2%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.
CTAS vs IMO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $8.2B |
| Net Profit | $502.5M | $359.2M |
| Gross Margin | 83.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.4% | -59.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.24 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $8.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $9.8B |
| Q1 26 | $502.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $359.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $393.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $692.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $940.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $894.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $903.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $827.1M |
| Q1 26 | 83.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $183.2M | $833.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $16.2B |
| Total Assets | — | $30.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $183.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $833.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $714.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $16.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $18.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $17.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $17.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $30.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $31.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $32.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $32.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $31.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $32.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 0.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.3B | $938.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.7% | 11.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | 5.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.12× | 3.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5B | $3.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $938.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $944.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $725.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $824.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $997.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $730.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $852.6M |
| Q1 26 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 8.7% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 3.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 1.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | 1.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
