vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and Realty Income (O). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.9× Realty Income). Realty Income runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs 17.7%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Realty Income posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.0% vs 9.3%). Realty Income produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.2B vs $425.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Realty Income's revenue compounded faster (8.6% CAGR vs 7.9%).

Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.

Realty Income Corporation is a real estate investment trust that invests in free-standing, single-tenant commercial properties in the United States, the United Kingdom, and six other countries in Europe. These properties are subject to NNN Leases. The company is organized in Maryland with its headquarters in San Diego, California.

CTAS vs O — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CTAS
CTAS
1.9× larger
CTAS
$2.8B
$1.5B
O
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
O
O
+1.7% gap
O
11.0%
9.3%
CTAS
Higher net margin
O
O
2.2% more per $
O
19.9%
17.7%
CTAS
More free cash flow
O
O
$729.0M more FCF
O
$1.2B
$425.0M
CTAS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
O
O
Annualised
O
8.6%
7.9%
CTAS

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Revenue
$2.8B
$1.5B
Net Profit
$495.3M
$296.1M
Gross Margin
50.4%
Operating Margin
23.4%
21.7%
Net Margin
17.7%
19.9%
Revenue YoY
9.3%
11.0%
Net Profit YoY
10.4%
48.3%
EPS (diluted)
$1.21
$0.32

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
$2.8B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$2.7B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$1.3B
Q1 24
$2.4B
$1.3B
Net Profit
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
$495.3M
$296.1M
Q3 25
$491.1M
$315.8M
Q2 25
$448.3M
$196.9M
Q1 25
$463.5M
$249.8M
Q4 24
$448.5M
$199.6M
Q3 24
$452.0M
$269.5M
Q2 24
$414.3M
$259.4M
Q1 24
$397.6M
$132.3M
Gross Margin
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
50.4%
Q3 25
50.3%
Q2 25
49.7%
Q1 25
50.6%
Q4 24
49.8%
Q3 24
50.1%
Q2 24
Q1 24
Operating Margin
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
23.4%
21.7%
Q3 25
22.7%
23.2%
Q2 25
22.4%
15.8%
Q1 25
23.4%
19.3%
Q4 24
23.1%
16.5%
Q3 24
22.4%
21.5%
Q2 24
22.2%
20.7%
Q1 24
21.6%
11.9%
Net Margin
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
17.7%
19.9%
Q3 25
18.1%
21.5%
Q2 25
16.8%
14.0%
Q1 25
17.8%
18.1%
Q4 24
17.5%
14.9%
Q3 24
18.1%
20.2%
Q2 24
16.8%
19.4%
Q1 24
16.5%
10.5%
EPS (diluted)
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
$1.21
$0.32
Q3 25
$1.20
$0.35
Q2 25
$1.08
$0.22
Q1 25
$1.13
$0.28
Q4 24
$1.09
$0.23
Q3 24
$1.10
$0.30
Q2 24
$4.00
$0.29
Q1 24
$3.84
$0.16

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$200.8M
$434.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.5B
$39.4B
Total Assets
$10.1B
$72.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.54×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
$200.8M
$434.8M
Q3 25
$138.1M
$417.2M
Q2 25
$264.0M
$800.4M
Q1 25
$243.4M
$319.0M
Q4 24
$122.4M
$445.0M
Q3 24
$101.4M
$397.0M
Q2 24
$342.0M
$442.8M
Q1 24
$128.5M
$680.2M
Total Debt
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
$2.4B
Q3 25
$2.4B
Q2 25
$2.4B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
$2.0B
Q3 24
$2.0B
Q2 24
$2.0B
Q1 24
$2.5B
Stockholders' Equity
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
$4.5B
$39.4B
Q3 25
$4.8B
$39.1B
Q2 25
$4.7B
$39.2B
Q1 25
$4.6B
$39.0B
Q4 24
$4.3B
$38.8B
Q3 24
$4.0B
$38.5B
Q2 24
$4.3B
$38.6B
Q1 24
$4.2B
$39.0B
Total Assets
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
$10.1B
$72.8B
Q3 25
$9.8B
$71.3B
Q2 25
$9.8B
$71.4B
Q1 25
$9.6B
$69.8B
Q4 24
$9.4B
$68.8B
Q3 24
$9.1B
$68.5B
Q2 24
$9.2B
$68.1B
Q1 24
$9.0B
$68.3B
Debt / Equity
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
0.54×
Q3 25
0.51×
Q2 25
0.52×
Q1 25
0.44×
Q4 24
0.47×
Q3 24
0.50×
Q2 24
0.47×
Q1 24
0.58×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$531.2M
$1.2B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$425.0M
$1.2B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
15.2%
77.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.8%
3.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.07×
4.06×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.8B
$3.9B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
$531.2M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$414.5M
$943.1M
Q2 25
$635.7M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$622.0M
$787.5M
Q4 24
$441.4M
$972.0M
Q3 24
$466.7M
$841.5M
Q2 24
$693.0M
$981.2M
Q1 24
$657.1M
$778.7M
Free Cash Flow
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
$425.0M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$312.5M
$909.9M
Q2 25
$521.1M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$522.1M
$764.6M
Q4 24
$340.0M
$935.8M
Q3 24
$373.8M
$807.9M
Q2 24
$591.1M
$939.2M
Q1 24
$550.1M
$769.0M
FCF Margin
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
15.2%
77.6%
Q3 25
11.5%
61.9%
Q2 25
19.5%
73.3%
Q1 25
20.0%
55.4%
Q4 24
13.3%
69.8%
Q3 24
14.9%
60.7%
Q2 24
23.9%
70.1%
Q1 24
22.9%
61.0%
Capex Intensity
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
3.8%
3.3%
Q3 25
3.8%
2.3%
Q2 25
4.3%
1.9%
Q1 25
3.8%
1.7%
Q4 24
4.0%
2.7%
Q3 24
3.7%
2.5%
Q2 24
4.1%
3.1%
Q1 24
4.4%
0.8%
Cash Conversion
CTAS
CTAS
O
O
Q4 25
1.07×
4.06×
Q3 25
0.84×
2.99×
Q2 25
1.42×
5.39×
Q1 25
1.34×
3.15×
Q4 24
0.98×
4.87×
Q3 24
1.03×
3.12×
Q2 24
1.67×
3.78×
Q1 24
1.65×
5.89×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CTAS
CTAS

Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment$2.2B77%
First Aid And Safety Services Segment$342.2M12%
Fire Protection Services$222.5M8%
Uniform Direct Sales$79.8M3%

O
O

Product And Service Retail$900.8M61%
Other$531.5M36%

Related Comparisons