vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (REZI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.5× RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 7.2%, a 10.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cintas posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs 2.0%). Cintas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($425.0M vs $262.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs 7.9%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Resideo Technologies, Inc. is an American multinational company that was formed in 2018 out of a spin-off from Honeywell. It provides room air temperature, quality, and humidity control and security systems primarily in residential dwellings in the U.S. and internationally. The company operates in two segments: products and distribution. It manufactures and distributes smart-home and software products, including temperature and lighting control, security, and water and air monitoring. The com...
CTAS vs REZI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $495.3M | $136.0M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 7.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 491.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $-825.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $397.6M | $43.0M |
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.9% |
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.6% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | -42.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.5% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $-5.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.84 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.8M | $661.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $3.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $8.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $661.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $345.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $753.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $577.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $692.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $531.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $413.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.5M | $603.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $6.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.58× | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $531.2M | $299.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $425.0M | $262.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.2% | 13.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 2.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | $-1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $299.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $200.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $-65.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.1M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $262.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $181.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $550.1M | $-19.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | -85.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | -10.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | -10.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 8.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 7.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 3.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.65× | 0.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
REZI
| ADI Global Distribution Segment | $1.2B | 62% |
| Safety And Security | $257.0M | 14% |
| Air | $211.0M | 11% |
| Energy Service | $153.0M | 8% |
| Public Utilities Inventory Water | $91.0M | 5% |
