vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.5× Science Applications International Corp). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 4.2%, a 13.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cintas posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs 2.6%). Cintas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($425.0M vs $120.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
CTAS vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $495.3M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $397.6M | $39.0M |
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.6% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.5% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.84 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.8M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.5M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.58× | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $531.2M | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $425.0M | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.2% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.1M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $550.1M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.65× | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
