vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.1× Tapestry, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 17.7%, a 4.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 9.3%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $425.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 7.9%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
CTAS vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $495.3M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $397.6M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.6% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.5% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.84 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.8M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.5M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.58× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $531.2M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $425.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.2% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.1M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $550.1M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.65× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
