vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.5× Williams-Sonoma, Inc.). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 12.8%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cintas posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs 4.6%). Cintas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($425.0M vs $248.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs -9.1%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Williams Sonoma is an American retailer of cookware, appliances, and home furnishings. It is owned by Williams-Sonoma, Inc., and was founded by Charles E. (Chuck) Williams in 1956.
CTAS vs WSM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $495.3M | $241.6M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 46.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 4.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $1.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $241.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $384.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $249.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $265.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $397.6M | $354.4M |
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 48.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.0% |
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.6% | 20.1% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.5% | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $2.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $1.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $1.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $4.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.84 | $5.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.8M | $884.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $884.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $985.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $826.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.5M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.58× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $531.2M | $316.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $425.0M | $248.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.2% | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 1.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $316.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $282.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $633.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $253.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $246.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $226.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.1M | $674.9M |
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $248.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $230.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $566.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $170.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $215.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $187.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $550.1M | $621.2M |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 27.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.65× | 1.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
WSM
Segment breakdown not available.
