vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Claritev Corp (CTEV) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KILROY REALTY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($272.2M vs $246.6M, roughly 1.1× Claritev Corp). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -32.7%, a 39.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Claritev Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $36.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Claritev Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.5% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
CTEV vs KRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $246.6M | $272.2M |
| Net Profit | $-80.6M | $17.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -32.7% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | -5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 41.6% | -73.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.88 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $246.6M | $272.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $246.0M | $279.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $241.6M | $289.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $231.3M | $270.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.1M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.5M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.5M | $280.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.5M | $278.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-80.6M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-69.8M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-62.6M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-71.3M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-138.0M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-391.4M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-576.7M | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-539.7M | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -146.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -224.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -207.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -32.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.4% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.9% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -169.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -247.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -230.1% | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-4.88 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.23 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.81 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.38 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.49 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.25 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.78 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-33.40 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.8M | $179.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-173.9M | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.8M | $179.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.4M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1M | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $165.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.6M | $625.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $835.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.7M | $855.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-173.9M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-101.8M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-39.9M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.6M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $603.4M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4B | $11.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 304.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.67× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.48× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.85× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $66.3M | $566.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.4M | $450.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.8% | 165.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.1% | 42.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 33.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.3M | $833.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $66.3M | $566.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.2M | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.1M | $136.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.4M | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.8M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.5M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.7M | $167.9M |
| Q4 25 | $36.4M | $450.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.3M | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-68.9M | $115.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-63.8M | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.1M | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.2M | $151.9M |
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 165.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.6% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.8% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.5% | 153.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | 54.5% |
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.0% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
