vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Custom Truck One Source, Inc. (CTOS) and OLD NATIONAL BANCORP (ONB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($702.8M vs $461.6M, roughly 1.5× Custom Truck One Source, Inc.). OLD NATIONAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 33.3% vs -0.9%, a 34.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLD NATIONAL BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.6% vs -12.6%). Over the past eight quarters, OLD NATIONAL BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (34.5% CAGR vs 20.0%).
Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is a leading provider of specialized heavy truck and equipment solutions in North America. It offers custom vehicle manufacturing, equipment sales and rentals, aftermarket parts, and maintenance services, serving core infrastructure, utility, construction, and energy industry segments.
Old National Bank is an American regional bank with nearly 200 retail branches operated by Old National Bancorp and based in Chicago and Evansville, Indiana. With assets at $48.5 billion and 250 banking centers, Old National Bancorp is the largest financial services bank holding company headquartered in Indiana and one of the top 30 banking companies in the U.S. Old National Bank has locations in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.
CTOS vs ONB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $461.6M | $702.8M |
| Net Profit | $-4.1M | $233.7M |
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.9% | 33.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.6% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | 61.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $461.6M | $702.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $387.3M | $580.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.9M | $574.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.2M | $514.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $307.1M | $387.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $398.3M | $394.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.5M | $391.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.6M | $388.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-4.1M | $233.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | $216.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $182.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.4M | $125.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.8M | $144.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.6M | $153.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.4M | $143.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.5M | $121.2M |
| Q1 26 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 30.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 47.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 47.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 40.3% |
| Q1 26 | -0.9% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 37.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.6% | 31.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.2% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.6% | 31.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.11 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.2M | $8.5B |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $73.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $805.2M | $8.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $809.1M | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $784.7M | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $790.1M | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $813.4M | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $861.3M | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $837.5M | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $856.7M | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | $73.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $72.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $71.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $71.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $53.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $53.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $53.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $53.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.79× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTOS
| Equipment sales | $292.6M | 63% |
| Rental revenue | $137.2M | 30% |
| Parts sales and services | $31.8M | 7% |
ONB
Segment breakdown not available.
