vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($346.7M vs $197.1M, roughly 1.8× Citi Trends Inc). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.4% vs -3.5%, a 18.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
CTRN vs DLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $346.7M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $53.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 17.9% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 15.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -21.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $346.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $315.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $369.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $304.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $288.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $53.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $91.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $67.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $38.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 86.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 90.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 88.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 12.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 13.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $644.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $702.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $699.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $626.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $520.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $482.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $869.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $3.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $54.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $472.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $174.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $106.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $327.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $21.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $435.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $61.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $297.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $13.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 142.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 45.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 97.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 4.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 9.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.55× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTRN
Segment breakdown not available.
DLB
| Licensing | $319.8M | 92% |
| Products and services | $26.9M | 8% |
