vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Citi Trends Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.1M vs $104.1M, roughly 1.9× GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.). GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -1.4% vs -3.5%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
CTRN vs GDYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $104.1M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 61.7% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | -1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -150.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $104.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $100.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $100.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $83.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $306.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-817.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 61.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $327.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $530.1M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $605.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $327.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $342.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $338.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $336.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $325.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $334.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $530.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $542.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $537.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $532.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $517.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $517.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $400.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $388.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $605.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $612.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $613.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $608.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $590.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $592.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $477.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $443.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $10.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 32.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 5.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 2.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
