vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and MAXLINEAR, INC (MXL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Citi Trends Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.1M vs $137.2M, roughly 1.4× MAXLINEAR, INC). Citi Trends Inc runs the higher net margin — -3.5% vs -32.9%, a 29.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAXLINEAR, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.0% vs 10.1%). Over the past eight quarters, MAXLINEAR, INC's revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
MaxLinear, Inc. is an American electronic hardware company. Founded in 2003, it provides highly integrated radio-frequency (RF) analog and mixed-signal semiconductor products for broadband communications applications. It is a New York Stock Exchange-traded company.
CTRN vs MXL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $137.2M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $-45.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 30.0% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | -32.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 43.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -203.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $-0.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $137.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $136.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $126.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $95.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $92.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $81.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $-14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $-26.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $-49.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $-57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $-75.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-39.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | -32.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | -22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | -44.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | -44.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | -32.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | -36.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | -24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | -51.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | -62.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | -93.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | -42.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $-0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $61.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $123.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $454.2M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $771.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $72.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $111.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $108.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $118.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $185.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $123.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $454.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $464.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $488.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $493.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $516.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $556.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $617.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $771.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $796.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $808.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $863.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $855.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $864.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $895.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $973.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $-27.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $-2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $-5.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | -32.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | -6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
