vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Citi Trends Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.1M vs $187.0M, roughly 1.1× National Storage Affiliates Trust). National Storage Affiliates Trust runs the higher net margin — 12.2% vs -3.5%, a 15.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -1.6%). National Storage Affiliates Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($299.8M vs $767.0K). Over the past eight quarters, National Storage Affiliates Trust's revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
National Storage Affiliates Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on self-storage assets. It owns, operates and acquires self-storage facilities across dozens of U.S. states, offering secure storage solutions for residential and commercial customers.
CTRN vs NSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $187.0M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 20.2% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $188.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $188.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $190.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $193.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $196.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 30.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $23.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $946.0M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $50.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $946.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $986.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $5.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $338.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $299.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 160.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 20.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 14.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $541.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $338.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $100.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $79.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $85.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $363.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $105.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $299.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $79.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $344.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $79.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $88.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 160.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 181.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 5.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | 1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
