vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Citi Trends Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.1M vs $142.2M, roughly 1.4× UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs -3.5%, a 28.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Citi Trends Inc's revenue compounded faster (-4.3% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
CTRN vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | — |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTRN
Segment breakdown not available.
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
