vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and PHOTRONICS INC (PLAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PHOTRONICS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.4M vs $197.1M, roughly 1.1× Citi Trends Inc). PHOTRONICS INC runs the higher net margin — 10.9% vs -3.5%, a 14.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -5.5%). PHOTRONICS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($25.2M vs $767.0K). Over the past eight quarters, PHOTRONICS INC's revenue compounded faster (-3.8% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Photronics, Inc. is an American semiconductor photomask manufacturer. It was the third largest photomask supplier globally as of 2009. Photronics is a member of the eBeam Initiative.
CTRN vs PLAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $210.4M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 22.9% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 10.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -5.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -32.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $210.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $211.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $212.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $222.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $211.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $217.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $216.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $36.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $26.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.6% |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 26.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 26.6% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 16.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.68 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $575.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $16.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $575.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $558.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $642.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $606.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $559.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $521.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $50.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $25.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 12.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 11.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $64.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $50.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $31.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $78.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $68.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $75.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $41.5M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $-29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $43.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $56.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 24.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | -0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 3.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | 1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTRN
Segment breakdown not available.
PLAB
| High End Integrated Circuits | $53.6M | 25% |
| High End Flat Panel Displays | $53.5M | 25% |
| KR | $43.7M | 21% |
| Other | $42.1M | 20% |
| Mainstream Flat Panel Displays | $9.1M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 4% |