vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Citi Trends Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.1M vs $184.5M, roughly 1.1× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -3.5%, a 10.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 10.1%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $767.0K). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
CTRN vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTRN
Segment breakdown not available.
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
