vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($212.2M vs $197.1M, roughly 1.1× Citi Trends Inc). LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.8% vs -3.5%, a 22.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 8.6%). Over the past eight quarters, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., is an American SaaS company that offers a data connectivity platform whose services include data onboarding, the transfer of offline data online for marketing purposes.
CTRN vs RAMP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $212.2M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $39.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 71.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 18.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 8.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | 255.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $212.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $194.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $188.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $195.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $176.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $171.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $-5.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 72.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 70.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.2% |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | -8.3% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $-0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $403.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $962.3M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $403.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $376.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $371.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $420.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $384.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $348.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $342.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $368.9M |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $962.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $943.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $947.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $948.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $957.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $932.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $951.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $949.1M |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $57.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $55.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | -2.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
