vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($260.4M vs $197.1M, roughly 1.3× Citi Trends Inc). Smith Douglas Homes Corp. runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -3.5%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -9.4%). Smith Douglas Homes Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $767.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
CTRN vs SDHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $260.4M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $260.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $223.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $224.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $287.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $220.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $189.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.1% |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $12.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $86.7M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $557.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $32.8M |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $59.7M |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $557.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $571.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $570.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $513.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $460.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $429.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $401.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $-36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $39.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $-31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $-35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $-9.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | -5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 10.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | -12.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | -3.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTRN
Segment breakdown not available.
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
