vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Shutterstock, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.2M vs $197.1M, roughly 1.1× Citi Trends Inc). Citi Trends Inc runs the higher net margin — -3.5% vs -7.3%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -12.0%). Shutterstock, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($25.9M vs $767.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Shutterstock, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.4% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Shutterstock, Inc. is an American provider of stock photography, stock footage, stock music, and editing tools; it is headquartered in New York. Founded in 2002 by programmer and photographer Jon Oringer, Shutterstock maintains a library of around 200 million royalty-free stock photos, vector graphics, and illustrations, with around 10 million video clips and music tracks available for licensing. Originally a subscription site only, Shutterstock expanded beyond subscriptions into à la carte p...
CTRN vs SSTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $220.2M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $-16.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | -1.1% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -1021.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $-0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $220.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $260.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $242.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $250.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $250.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $220.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $214.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 58.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $178.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $581.0M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $178.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $165.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $71.8M |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $581.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $594.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $586.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $547.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $518.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $522.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $520.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $541.3M |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $1.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $36.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $25.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 11.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $123.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $36.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $25.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $8.3M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $-952.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | -2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 5.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | 0.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.