vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STAG Industrial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($224.2M vs $197.1M, roughly 1.1× Citi Trends Inc). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs -3.5%, a 31.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 9.1%). Over the past eight quarters, STAG Industrial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
CTRN vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $104.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $143.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $103.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $86.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $105.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 2.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
