vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cytosorbents Corp (CTSO) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $9.2M, roughly 1.4× Cytosorbents Corp). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -59.5%, a 46.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 0.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 1.3%).
CytoSorbents Corporation is a publicly traded company located in Princeton, New Jersey.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
CTSO vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.2M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 73.7% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | -59.5% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.4% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.6M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.8M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.1M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 73.7% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.3% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.9% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.1% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.4% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.5% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.5% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.2% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -37.6% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -37.1% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.1% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -40.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -51.8% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | -59.5% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -33.4% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.9% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.7% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -48.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -67.7% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.2M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $44.2M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.9M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.6M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $44.2M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.8M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.8M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.4M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.4M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.1M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.23× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.8M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -53.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.3M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.8M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -53.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -54.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTSO
| Direct | $5.1M | 55% |
| Distributors And Strategic Partners | $4.2M | 45% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
