vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CubeSmart (CUBE) and UL Solutions Inc. (ULS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

UL Solutions Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($340.0M vs $281.9M, roughly 1.2× CubeSmart). On growth, CubeSmart posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -12.4%). Over the past eight quarters, CubeSmart's revenue compounded faster (2.9% CAGR vs -31.8%).

CubeSmart is a real estate investment trust that invests in self storage facilities in the United States. As of December 31, 2024, it owned 631 self storage properties in 25 states and the District of Columbia containing 45.8 million rentable square feet. It is the 3rd largest self storage company in the United States.

The UL enterprise is a global private safety company headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, composed of three organizations, UL Research Institutes, UL Standards & Engagement and UL Solutions.

CUBE vs ULS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ULS
ULS
1.2× larger
ULS
$340.0M
$281.9M
CUBE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CUBE
CUBE
+15.6% gap
CUBE
3.3%
-12.4%
ULS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CUBE
CUBE
Annualised
CUBE
2.9%
-31.8%
ULS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Revenue
$281.9M
$340.0M
Net Profit
$82.8M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
40.2%
24.4%
Net Margin
29.4%
Revenue YoY
3.3%
-12.4%
Net Profit YoY
-6.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.36

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$281.9M
$340.0M
Q4 25
$282.7M
$789.0M
Q3 25
$285.1M
$783.0M
Q2 25
$282.3M
$776.0M
Q1 25
$273.0M
$705.0M
Q4 24
$267.7M
$739.0M
Q3 24
$270.9M
$731.0M
Q2 24
$266.2M
$730.0M
Net Profit
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$82.8M
Q4 25
$77.7M
$67.0M
Q3 25
$82.4M
$100.0M
Q2 25
$82.4M
$91.0M
Q1 25
$88.7M
$67.0M
Q4 24
$101.9M
$81.0M
Q3 24
$101.0M
$88.0M
Q2 24
$94.2M
$101.0M
Gross Margin
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
68.7%
49.7%
Q3 25
68.1%
50.3%
Q2 25
68.5%
49.4%
Q1 25
69.6%
48.4%
Q4 24
71.7%
47.4%
Q3 24
69.8%
49.0%
Q2 24
68.8%
50.1%
Operating Margin
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
40.2%
24.4%
Q4 25
15.0%
Q3 25
19.9%
Q2 25
17.9%
Q1 25
15.5%
Q4 24
15.6%
Q3 24
17.8%
Q2 24
17.3%
Net Margin
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
29.4%
Q4 25
27.5%
8.5%
Q3 25
28.9%
12.8%
Q2 25
29.2%
11.7%
Q1 25
32.5%
9.5%
Q4 24
38.1%
11.0%
Q3 24
37.3%
12.0%
Q2 24
35.4%
13.8%
EPS (diluted)
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$0.36
Q4 25
$0.35
$0.33
Q3 25
$0.36
$0.49
Q2 25
$0.36
$0.45
Q1 25
$0.39
$0.33
Q4 24
$0.45
$0.40
Q3 24
$0.44
$0.44
Q2 24
$0.41
$0.50

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.7B
Total Assets
$6.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$5.8M
$295.0M
Q3 25
$108.4M
$255.0M
Q2 25
$8.7M
$272.0M
Q1 25
$10.8M
$267.0M
Q4 24
$71.6M
$298.0M
Q3 24
$43.5M
$327.0M
Q2 24
$5.7M
$295.0M
Total Debt
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$491.0M
Q3 25
$544.0M
Q2 25
$608.0M
Q1 25
$653.0M
Q4 24
$742.0M
Q3 24
$797.0M
Q2 24
$810.0M
Stockholders' Equity
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$2.7B
Q4 25
$2.7B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$2.8B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$2.8B
$1.1B
Q1 25
$2.8B
$970.0M
Q4 24
$2.9B
$904.0M
Q3 24
$2.8B
$872.0M
Q2 24
$2.8B
$769.0M
Total Assets
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$6.6B
Q4 25
$6.6B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$6.8B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$6.7B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$6.7B
$2.9B
Q4 24
$6.4B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$6.2B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$6.2B
$2.7B
Debt / Equity
CUBE
CUBE
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.39×
Q3 25
0.46×
Q2 25
0.56×
Q1 25
0.67×
Q4 24
0.82×
Q3 24
0.91×
Q2 24
1.05×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CUBE
CUBE

Rental income$239.9M85%
Other$32.1M11%
Property management fee income$9.9M4%

ULS
ULS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons