vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cue Biopharma, Inc. (CUE) and i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cue Biopharma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.9M vs $21.3M, roughly 1.0× i-80 Gold Corp.). Cue Biopharma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.2% vs -401.9%, a 409.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Cue Biopharma is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing novel targeted immunotherapies for cancer, autoimmune disorders, and inflammatory diseases. Its proprietary platform enables precise T-cell activity modulation, with core operations in North America and global pharma partnerships to advance lead product candidates through clinical trials.
i-80 Gold Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm focused on gold and silver asset operations in Nevada, US. It advances high-potential mining projects, using responsible extraction practices to deliver precious metals to global industrial and investment markets.
CUE vs IAUX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.9M | $21.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-85.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | -291.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.2% | -401.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 1292.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 116.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.9M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.0K | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $-85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $-41.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.5M | $-30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.3M | $-41.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.7M | $-43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.2M | $-41.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -42.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -171.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | -291.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -353.4% | -86.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -292.3% | -67.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2921.4% | -112.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -264.2% | -210.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -390.6% | -435.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -737.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | -401.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -346.6% | -130.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -287.1% | -108.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2911.4% | -293.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -259.6% | -374.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -382.7% | -570.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -719.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.25 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.1M | $63.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.4M | $346.8M |
| Total Assets | $42.2M | $703.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.1M | $63.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7M | $102.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.5M | $133.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $13.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $21.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.0M | $47.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $174.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $175.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $175.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $26.4M | $346.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $423.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2M | $463.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | $318.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $377.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $42.2M | $703.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $756.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $782.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.3M | $659.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.10× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.1M | $-34.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-39.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -184.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 23.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.68× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-93.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.0M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.2M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.5M | $-23.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.0M | $-24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-39.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.5M | $-23.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.0M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -184.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -116.5% | -44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1976.7% | -164.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2309.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -225.7% | -206.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -376.2% | -349.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -573.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CUE
| Immuno Scape Collaboration And License Agreement | $9.5M | 43% |
| BI Collaboration And License Agreement | $8.1M | 37% |
| Other | $4.3M | 20% |
IAUX
| Granite Creek Mining Company | $20.3M | 95% |
| Ruby Hill Mining Company LLC | $991.0K | 5% |
| Lone Tree Minning Company | $3.0K | 0% |
