vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB) and Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globalstar, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($72.0M vs $54.1M, roughly 1.3× Curbline Properties Corp.). Curbline Properties Corp. runs the higher net margin — 17.6% vs -16.1%, a 33.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
CURB vs GSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $54.1M | $72.0M |
| Net Profit | $9.6M | $-11.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | -0.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.6% | -16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 17.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 76.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $54.1M | $72.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.6M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.4M | $67.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $56.5M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-50.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.4M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-13.2M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | -14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.8% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 17.6% | -16.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 28.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | -28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -82.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.08 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $289.6M | $447.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $423.2M | $483.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $355.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | 1.36× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $289.6M | $447.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.1M | $346.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $429.9M | $308.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $594.0M | $241.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $391.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $64.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.3M |
| Q4 25 | $423.2M | $483.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.4M | $508.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.1M | $491.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.0M | $502.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $511.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $394.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $393.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $398.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $355.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $364.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $360.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $344.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $358.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $394.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $383.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $377.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $917.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $926.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $917.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $124.6M | $175.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 13.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.6M | $175.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | $236.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.2M | $157.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $51.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.8M |
| Q4 25 | 13.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.19× | 216.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.28× | 8.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CURB
Segment breakdown not available.
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
