vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $54.1M, roughly 1.1× Curbline Properties Corp.). Curbline Properties Corp. runs the higher net margin — 17.6% vs -171.1%, a 188.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
CURB vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $54.1M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $9.6M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | 17.6% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $54.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-79.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 44.0% |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -279.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 42.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $289.6M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $423.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $289.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $429.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $594.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $231.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $454.6M |
| Q4 25 | $423.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $870.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $911.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $124.6M | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 13.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-56.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -4.47× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
