vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI) and TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.4M vs $19.2M, roughly 1.1× CuriosityStream Inc.). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 65.0% vs -19.7%, a 84.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CuriosityStream Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.8% vs 17.7%). Over the past eight quarters, CuriosityStream Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.5% CAGR vs 9.1%).
Curiosity Stream Inc., formerly branded as CuriosityStream, is an American media company and over-the-top subscription video streaming service which offers documentary programming including films, series, and TV shows. The company offers a video on demand subscription service branded as "Curiosity Stream" and a linear broadcast television channel known as the Curiosity Channel through various services including FuboTV and The Roku Channel.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust managed by global alternative asset firm TPG. It primarily invests in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, performing and non-performing mortgage loans, and other credit-linked real estate assets, with its core market being the United States. It generates returns via net interest income from holdings and strategic asset disposition gains.
CURI vs MITT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.2M | $20.4M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $13.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | 67.1% |
| Net Margin | -19.7% | 65.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.8% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -34.6% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.7M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $784.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.0K | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.0M | $20.9M |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | 67.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 54.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.4% | 76.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.6% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -19.7% | 65.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.4% | 102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.9% | 82.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.3% | 111.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.4% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.0% | 121.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.3M | $57.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $41.5M | $560.7M |
| Total Assets | $75.7M | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.3M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | $115.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.5M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.8M | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | $41.5M | $560.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $559.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.8M | $536.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.1M | $543.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $543.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.2M | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.8M | $533.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.0M | $539.6M |
| Q4 25 | $75.7M | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.7M | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.3M | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.2M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.9M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.6M | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.0M | $59.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $59.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $666.0K | $12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 2.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.03× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
