vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CVR ENERGY INC (CVI) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CVR ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.1× SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs -6.1%, a 19.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.8% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs -1.4%).
CVR Energy Inc is a United States-based energy holding company operating two core segments: petroleum refining and nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing. It produces a wide range of products including gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and agricultural fertilizers, primarily serving commercial, industrial and agricultural customers across North America.
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
CVI vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $-110.0M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | -3.1% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | -6.1% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -492.9% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.09 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-110.0M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-114.0M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-123.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.0M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-124.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.8% | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.7% | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.5% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.9% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.2% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.09 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.72 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.14 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.22 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.24 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $511.0M | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $730.0M | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $3.7B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.40× | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $511.0M | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.0M | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.0M | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $695.0M | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $987.0M | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $534.0M | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $586.0M | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $730.0M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $840.0M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $466.0M | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $580.0M | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.0M | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $675.0M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $849.0M | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $0 | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.0M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.0M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-195.0M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.0M | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.0M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.0M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-246.0M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.0M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.0M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.44× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.50× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.86× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVI
| Petroleum Segment | $1.6B | 91% |
| Product UAN | $64.0M | 4% |
| Product Ammonia | $51.0M | 3% |
| Renewables Diesel | $27.0M | 1% |
| Product Urea Products | $8.0M | 0% |
| Renewable Fuel Credits | $7.0M | 0% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |
