vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CPI AEROSTRUCTURES INC (CVU) and MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MicroAlgo Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.3M vs $19.4M, roughly 1.4× CPI AEROSTRUCTURES INC). On growth, CPI AEROSTRUCTURES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-10.8% vs -35.5%).
CPI Aerostructures Inc., known as CPI Aero, is a contract aircraft component manufacturer based in Edgewood, New York.
MicroAlgo Inc. is a technology enterprise specializing in custom algorithm optimization solutions. It mainly serves clients across smart city management, industrial internet, and e-commerce sectors, helping enterprises improve operational efficiency, reduce operating costs, and optimize data processing performance for real business scenarios.
CVU vs MLGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.4M | $26.3M |
| Net Profit | $691.8K | — |
| Gross Margin | 20.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -10.8% | -35.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -28.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $19.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $34.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.8M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $691.8K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $971.5K | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $749.7K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $168.2K | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $319.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $25.8M | $317.6M |
| Total Assets | $75.2M | $330.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $319.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $164.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.8M | $317.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.9M | $144.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.1M | $76.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $75.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.3M | $330.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $176.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.2M | $107.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -10.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -3.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.1K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-596.3K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $715.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-591.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-960.5K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.1K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-599.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $586.9K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-746.9K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.53× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.42× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVU
| Government Subcontracts | $16.4M | 85% |
| Commercial Contracts | $2.3M | 12% |
| Prime Government Contracts | $725.8K | 4% |
MLGO
Segment breakdown not available.
