vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (CWAN) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vroom, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($235.9M vs $217.5M, roughly 1.1× Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.). Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -5.4% vs -59.8%, a 54.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (72.0% vs 12.9%). Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($52.3M vs $-108.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (45.5% CAGR vs -49.5%).
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. is an American software-as-a-service (SaaS) fintech company that provides automated investment accounting, performance, compliance, and risk reporting worldwide. Clearwater is a publicly traded company headquartered in Boise, Idaho, with additional offices in London, Edinburgh, New York City and Noida.
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
CWAN vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.5M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $-11.8M | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | -5.4% | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 72.0% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -102.8% | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $217.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-11.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-430.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 67.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 65.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 73.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 73.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 331.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $91.2M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $822.6M | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $91.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $255.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $257.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $267.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $822.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $878.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $380.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $406.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $623.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $585.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $547.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.3M | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $52.3M | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.3M | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $55.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-29.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.76× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.29× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
