vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. (CWK) and DXC Technology Co (DXC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DXC Technology Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.2B vs $2.9B, roughly 1.1× Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.). DXC Technology Co runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -0.8%, a 4.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.8% vs -1.0%). DXC Technology Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($359.0M vs $234.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs -2.9%).
Cushman & Wakefield Inc. is an American global commercial real estate and property management services firm. The company's corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois. It is named after co-founders J. Clydesdale Cushman and Bernard Wakefield.
DXC Technology Company is an American multinational information technology (IT) services and consulting company headquartered in Ashburn, Virginia.
CWK vs DXC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $3.2B |
| Net Profit | $-22.4M | $107.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 8.2% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | -1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -119.8% | 87.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | $-22.4M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.4M | $36.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $264.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.9M | $57.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.7M | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.8M | $-200.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.3% | -5.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $0.61 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $1.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $-1.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $784.2M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | $3.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $7.7B | $13.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $784.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $623.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $793.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $553.5M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | $13.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $13.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5B | $13.9B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.45× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.57× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.70× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.73× | 1.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.81× | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.91× | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.96× | 1.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $257.3M | $414.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $234.3M | $359.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.0% | 11.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $293.0M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $257.3M | $414.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.5M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $186.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-162.0M | $315.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.2M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.1M | $195.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.8M | $238.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-125.1M | $280.0M |
| Q4 25 | $234.3M | $359.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.0M | $365.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $300.0K | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-166.6M | $238.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.9M | $568.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.7M | $154.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $190.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-135.6M | $242.0M |
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.2% | 7.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.58× | 11.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | 11.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | -85.26× | 1.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 11.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.82× | 4.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.61× | 9.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CWK
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $1.8B | 61% |
| Other | $1.1B | 39% |
DXC
| GIS Segment | $1.6B | 50% |
| CES Segment | $1.3B | 40% |
| Insurance Segment | $321.0M | 10% |
