vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. (CWK) and ON Semiconductor (ON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.9× ON Semiconductor). ON Semiconductor runs the higher net margin — 16.4% vs -0.8%, a 17.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.8% vs -10.0%). ON Semiconductor produced more free cash flow last quarter ($372.4M vs $234.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs -12.3%).
Cushman & Wakefield Inc. is an American global commercial real estate and property management services firm. The company's corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois. It is named after co-founders J. Clydesdale Cushman and Bernard Wakefield.
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
CWK vs ON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $-22.4M | $255.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -119.8% | -32.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $-22.4M | $255.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.4M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.3M | $-486.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.9M | $379.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.7M | $401.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $338.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.8M | $453.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.8% |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | -39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | -33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.3% | 24.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $-1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | $0.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $1.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $784.2M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | $3.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $7.9B |
| Total Assets | $7.7B | $13.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 0.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $784.2M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.2M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $623.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $793.3M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $553.5M | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $8.1B |
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $14.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $13.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5B | $13.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.45× | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.57× | 0.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.73× | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.81× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.91× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.96× | 0.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $257.3M | $418.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $234.3M | $372.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.0% | 24.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $293.0M | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $257.3M | $418.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.5M | $184.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-162.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.2M | $579.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.1M | $465.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.8M | $362.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-125.1M | $498.7M |
| Q4 25 | $234.3M | $372.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.0M | $106.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $300.0K | $454.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-166.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.9M | $434.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.7M | $293.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $207.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-135.6M | $276.3M |
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.2% | 14.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.58× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -85.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.82× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.61× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CWK
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $1.8B | 61% |
| Other | $1.1B | 39% |
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
